<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Salon.com Interview Posted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tom-swift.com/weblog/post/255/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tom-swift.com/weblog/post/255/</link>
	<description>The website of Minnesota author Tom Swift</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:01:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Swift</title>
		<link>http://tom-swift.com/weblog/post/255/comment-page-1/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Swift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 16:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom-swift.com/?p=255#comment-268</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a good question, c-dork, but I am afraid my answer reveals more about me than it does about the journalists. I am sincerely grateful for every ounce of interest the book has received. The publicity is crucial, surprising and extremely flattering. But I have a hard time reading/listening to articles/programs that are about me or about my work.

Usually I skim enough to know what was covered and pull out blurbs/links that can be used for promotional efforts. I leave the review of the reviews to my more stable better half. For example, when the Chicago Sun-Times review came out I missed two of the best lines in the piece. It wasn&#039;t until you mentioned one of them and another reader pointed out the other -- more than a week later -- that I looked closely enough to see them for myself.

As I write those words it occurs to me that this reply is probably fodder for some sort of psychiatric evaluation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a good question, c-dork, but I am afraid my answer reveals more about me than it does about the journalists. I am sincerely grateful for every ounce of interest the book has received. The publicity is crucial, surprising and extremely flattering. But I have a hard time reading/listening to articles/programs that are about me or about my work.</p>
<p>Usually I skim enough to know what was covered and pull out blurbs/links that can be used for promotional efforts. I leave the review of the reviews to my more stable better half. For example, when the Chicago Sun-Times review came out I missed two of the best lines in the piece. It wasn&#8217;t until you mentioned one of them and another reader pointed out the other &#8212; more than a week later &#8212; that I looked closely enough to see them for myself.</p>
<p>As I write those words it occurs to me that this reply is probably fodder for some sort of psychiatric evaluation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cycledork</title>
		<link>http://tom-swift.com/weblog/post/255/comment-page-1/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>cycledork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 01:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom-swift.com/?p=255#comment-261</guid>
		<description>You sounded really good in the interview and I thought I could hear your voice. That said, I understand that, for instance, quotes can get cleaned up before they make it to print. Other amendments can sometimes sneak in as well. As someone with years of experience, as a journalist, how well are your thoughts reflected on the other side of the notebook? I realize that not everyone who has interviewed you is a journalist, but I wonder what your specific experience in this interview and what your general experience as biographer has been.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You sounded really good in the interview and I thought I could hear your voice. That said, I understand that, for instance, quotes can get cleaned up before they make it to print. Other amendments can sometimes sneak in as well. As someone with years of experience, as a journalist, how well are your thoughts reflected on the other side of the notebook? I realize that not everyone who has interviewed you is a journalist, but I wonder what your specific experience in this interview and what your general experience as biographer has been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
